English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Modern software development teams are distributed across onsite and off-shorelocations. Each team has developers with varying experience levels and Englishcommunication skills. In such a diverse development environment it is importantto maintain the software quality, coding standards, timely delivery of featuresand bug fixes. It is also important to reduce testing effort, minimize sideeffects such as change in functionality, user experience or applicationperformance. Code reviews are intended to control code quality. Unfortunately,many projects lack enforcement of processes and standards because ofapproaching deadlines, live production issues and lack of resourceavailability. This study examines a novel structured, unit testable templatedcode method to enforce code review standards with an intent to reduce codingeffort, minimize revisions and eliminate functional and performance sideeffects on the system. The proposed method would also result in unit-testablecode that can also be easily rolled back and increase team productivity. Thebaseline for traditional code review processes using metrics such as codereview duration, bug regression rate, revision count was measured. Thesemetrics were then compared with results from the proposed code review processthat used structured unit testable templated code. The performance on 2 largeenterprise level applications spanning over 2 years and 9 feature andmaintenance release cycles was evaluated. The structured unit testabletemplated code method resulted in a decrease in total code review time,revision count and coding effort. It also decreased the number of liveproduction issues caused by code churn or side effects of bug fix when comparedto traditional code review process.

Structured Unit Testable Templated Code for Efficient Code Review Process