English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The State and its citizens generate lots of data. Once stored and processed,data can help resolve questions in Social Sciences, where it is common to needdata in a different level of aggregation than the data is presented. Inelection results, we would like to understand the decision of each voter orgroup of voters, but the data is only available at the polling-place level.This problem is known as ecological inference. In this work we compare twomethods to estimate the share of votes for each party according to differentage groups. This work is complemented with the analysis of votes between thefirst and second rounds, as well as a referendum during the first. Thisanalysis was performed on the 2014 uruguayan presidential elections.

An\'alisis de resultados electorales: comparaci\'on de m\'etodos y estimaci\'on de votos por franja etaria