English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Wiseman has claimed that Bell was wrong in stating that determinism wasinferred rather than assumed in the summary of the EPR argument in his 1964paper. The reply of Wiseman and his co-authors to my comment misstates myreasons for disputing this point, and fails to address the central criticismthat their claim is based on a seriously flawed formalization of Bell'sargument deriving from an unreasonably strong interpretation of the the terms,'influence', 'affect', and 'depend on'.

Response to Wiseman, Rieffel, and Cavalcanti on Bell's 1964 Paper