English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We show that asynchronous $t$ faults Byzantine system is equivalent toasynchronous $t$-resilient system, where unbeknownst to all, the private inputsof at most $t$ processors were altered and installed by a malicious oracle.  The immediate ramification is that dealing with asynchronous Byzantinesystems does not call for new topological methods, as was recently employed byvarious researchers: Asynchronous Byzantine is a standard asynchronous systemwith an input caveat. It also shows that two recent independent investigationsof vector $\epsilon$-agreement in the Byzantine model, and then in thefail-stop model, one was superfluous - in these problems the change of $t$inputs allowed in the Byzantine has no effect compared to the fail-stop case.  This result was motivated by the aim of casting any asynchronous system as asynchronous system where all processors are correct and it is the communicationsubstrate in the form of message-adversary that misbehaves. Thus, in addition,we get such a characterization for the asynchronous Byzantine system.

Some Garbage In - Some Garbage Out: Asynchronous t-Byzantine as Asynchronous Benign t-resilient system with fixed t-Trojan-Horse Inputs