English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Here we report the comparison of the upper critical fields of differentsuperconductors being calculated by two different theories i.e., WerthamerHelfand Hohenburg (WHH) and Ginzberg Landau (GL). All the samples aresynthesized through previously known solid state reaction route. Phase purityis determined from the Rietveld refinement of powder X-Ray diffraction (XRD)data. High field (up to 14Tesla) magneto transport \r{ho}(T)H of differentsuperconductors is studied to estimate their upper critical field (Hc2). Thepresent inter comparison covers from Cuprates (YBa2Cu3O7) - Borides (MgB2) - Fepnictides (NdFeAsO0.8F0.2) and chalcogenides (FeSe0.5Te0.5) to robust Nb2PdS5.The upper critical fields [Hc2(T)] at zero temperature are calculated byextrapolating the data using GL and WHH equations.

An inter comparison of the upper critical fields (Hc2) of different superconductors - YBa2Cu3O7, MgB2, NdFeAsO0.8F0.2, FeSe0.5Te0.5 and Nb2PdS5