English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We measure the impact of "altmetrics" field by deploying altmetricsindicators using the data from Google Scholar, Twitter, Mendeley, Facebook,Google-plus, CiteULike, Blogs and Wiki during 2010- 2014. To capture the socialimpact of scientific publications, we propose an index called alt-index,analogues to h-index. Across the deployed indices, our results have shown highcorrelation among the indicators that capture social impact. While we observemedium Pearson's correlation (\r{ho}= .247) among the alt-index and h-index, arelatively high correlation is observed between social citations and scholarlycitations (\r{ho}= .646). Interestingly, we find high turnover of socialcitations in the field compared with the traditional scholarly citations, i.e.social citations are 42.2 % more than traditional citations. The social mediumssuch as Twitter and Mendeley appear to be the most effective channels of socialimpact followed by Facebook and Google-plus. Overall, altmetrics appears to beworking well in the field of "altmetrics".

Altmetrics of "altmetrics" using Google Scholar, Twitter, Mendeley, Facebook, Google-plus, CiteULike, Blogs and Wiki