English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This paper analyzes the merits and demerits of global weak-indicationself-timed function blocks versus local weak-indication self-timed functionblocks, implemented using a delay-insensitive data code and adhering to 4-phasereturn-to-zero handshaking. A self-timed ripple carry adder is considered as anexample function block for the analysis. The analysis shows that while globalweak-indication could help in optimizing the power, latency and areaparameters, local weak-indication facilitates the optimum performance in termsof realizing the data-dependent cycle time that is characteristic of aweak-indication self-timed design.

Global versus Local Weak-Indication Self-Timed Function Blocks - A Comparative Analysis