English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Recently, S. Aggarwal [Chin. Phys. B 23 (2014) 093203] reported energylevels, radiative rates and lifetimes for the lowest 60 levels belonging to the2s$^2$2p$^5$, 2s2p$^6$ and 2s$^2$2p$^4$3$\ell$ configurations of F-liketungsten. There is no discrepancy for his calculated energies for the levelsand the radiative rates for the limited number of E1 transitions, but thereported results for lifetimes are highly inaccurate. According to ourcalculations, errors in his reported lifetimes are up to 6 orders of magnitudefor several levels. Here we report the correct lifetimes for future comparisonsand applications, and also explain the reason for discrepancies.

Comment on "Atomic structure calculations for F-like tungsten" by S. Aggarwal