English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Recently, S. Aggarwal et al. [Chin. Phys. B 24 (2015) 053201] reported energylevels, radiative rates and lifetimes for the lowest 148 levels belonging tothe 3s$^2$3p, 3s3p$^2$, 3s$^2$3d, 3s3p3d, 3p$^3$, 3p$^2$3d, 3s3d$^2$, 3p3d$^2$,and 3d$^3$ configurations of Al-like tungsten. While their calculated energiesfor the levels and the radiative rates for transitions are correct, thereported results for lifetimes are completely wrong. According to ourcalculations, errors in their reported lifetimes are up to 14 orders ofmagnitude for over 90\% of the levels. Here we report the correct lifetimes andexplain the reasons for discrepancies.

Comment on "Relativistic atomic data for W XLVII" by S. Aggarwal {\em et al.} [Chin. Phys. B 24 (2015) 053201]