English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Historical economic growth in countries of the former USSR is analysed. It isshown that Unified Growth Theory is contradicted by the data, which were used,but not analysed, during the formulation of this theory. Unified Growth Theorydoes not explain the mechanism of economic growth. It explains the mechanism ofMalthusian stagnation, which did not exist and it explains the mechanism of thetransition from stagnation to growth that did not happen. Unified Growth Theoryis full of stories but it is hard to decide which of them are reliable becausethey are based on unprofessional examination of data. The data show that theeconomic growth in the former USSR was never stagnant but hyperbolic.Industrial Revolution did not boost the economic growth in the former USSR.Unified Growth Theory needs to be revised or replaced by a reliable theory toreconcile it with data and to avoid creating the unwarranted sense of securityabout the current economic growth.

Unified Growth Theory Contradicted by the Economic Growth in the Former USSR