English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The importance of incorporating flavor constraints, when providing bounds onnew physics is stressed. As is well known it is very difficult for models ofnew physics to have scales lighter than about 10 TeV once flavor constraintsare built in. Although, in the conventional sense, this higher scale means moretuning, it may well make the underlying theory simpler as illustrated with oneexample. Direct production of new particles heavier than about 5 TeV becomesvery difficult at LHC though indirect signals such as deviations in the Higgsto gamma gamma branching ratio may still be possible. Also of course precisionstudies at low energy facilities can be useful for detecting new phenomena. Fordirect production of new particles over 5-10 TeV a new high energy colliderperhaps at 100 TeV is highly desirable. Indeed, a very strong physics case canbe made for such a machine. It can be used to significantly improve many boundsas well as allow a multitude of direct searches in many channels withoutrelying on specific models. Naturalness can be tested by another factor ofabout 50 past LHC to O($10^{-4}$), a valuable achievement in itself.

Unraveling flavor & naturalness from RUN II to 100 TeV