English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We have collected and analysed prices for more than 1.4 million flighttickets involving 63 destinations and 125 airlines and have found that commonsense violation i.e., discrepancies between what consumers would expect andwhat truly holds for those prices, are far more frequent than one would think.For example, oftentimes the price of a single leg flight is higher than two-legflights that include it under similar terms of travel (class, luggageallowance, etc.). This happened for up to 24.5% of available fares on aspecific route in our dataset invalidating the common expectation that "furtheris more expensive". Likewise, we found several two-leg fares where buying eachleg independently leads to lower overall cost than buying them together as asingle ticket. This happened for up to 37% of available fares on a specificroute invalidating the common expectation that "bundling saves money". Last,several single stop tickets in which the two legs were separated by 1-5 days(called multicity fares), were oftentimes found to be costing more thancorresponding back-to-back fares with a small transit time. This was found tobe occurring in up to 7.5% fares on a specific route invalidating that "a shorttransit is better than a longer one".

Testing for common sense (violation) in airline pricing or how complexity asymmetry defeated you and the web