English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

General relativity poses serious problems for counterfactual propositionspeculiar to it as a physical theory. Because these problems arise solely fromthe dynamical nature of spacetime geometry, they are shared by all schools ofthought on how counterfactuals should be interpreted and understood. Given therole of counterfactuals in the characterization of, inter alia, many accountsof scientific laws, theory confirmation and causation, general relativity onceagain presents us with idiosyncratic puzzles any attempt to analyze andunderstand the nature of scientific knowledge must face.

If Metrical Structure Were Not Dynamical, Counterfactuals in General Relativity Would Be Easy