English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Recently, the new Kinect One has been issued by Microsoft, providing the nextgeneration of real-time range sensing devices based on the Time-of-Flight (ToF)principle. As the first Kinect version was using a structured light approach,one would expect various differences in the characteristics of the range datadelivered by both devices. This paper presents a detailed and in-depthcomparison between both devices. In order to conduct the comparison, we proposea framework of seven different experimental setups, which is a generic basisfor evaluating range cameras such as Kinect. The experiments have been designedwith the goal to capture individual effects of the Kinect devices as isolatedlyas possible and in a way, that they can also be adopted, in order to apply themto any other range sensing device. The overall goal of this paper is to providea solid insight into the pros and cons of either device. Thus, scientists thatare interested in using Kinect range sensing cameras in their specificapplication scenario can directly assess the expected, specific benefits andpotential problem of either device.

Kinect Range Sensing: Structured-Light versus Time-of-Flight Kinect