English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In arXiv:1301.3829 and arXiv:1501.05148 I. M. Suslov proposes a theoreticaldescription for the interplay between disorder and superconductivity that,among other things, claims to predict situations where superconductivity isenhanced by disorder. In this comment we show that Suslov's results do not makeany sound predictions relating to this problem. Suslov also suggests that thepercolation approach recently employed by the authors to compute the globalcritical temperature of inhomogeneous superconductors induced by weakmultifractality is not satisfactory. We refute Suslov's opinion using simpleideas from the Bardeen-Cooper-Schiaffer (BCS) theory of superconductivity. Moreimportantly we stress that our theory makes quantitative analytical predictionsfor observables such as the global critical temperature and the spatialdistribution of the order parameter. Our work can therefore be easily confirmedor disproved through either numerical or experimental study.

Comment on arXiv:1301.3829 and Reply to 'Comment on "Can disorder really enhance superconductivity?"' arXiv:1501.05148 by I.M. Suslov