English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Whether natural factors could interpret the rise of the Earth's surfacetemperature is still controversial. Though numerous recent researches havereported apparent correlations between solar activity and the Earth's climate,solar activity has encountered a big problem when describing the rapid globalwarming after 1970s. Our investigation shows the good positive correlationsbetween the Earth's surface Ultraviolet irradiance (280-400 nm) and the Earth'ssurface temperature both in temporal and spatial variations by analyzing theglobal surface Ultraviolet irradiance (280-400 nm) and global surfacetemperature data from 1980-1999. The rise of CO$_2$ cannot interpret the goodpositive correlations, and we could even get an opposite result to the goodcorrelations when employing the rise of CO$_2$ to describe the relation betweenthem. Based on the good positive correlations, we suggest a new effect, named"Highly Excited Water Vapor" (HEWV) effect, which can interpret how the Suninfluences the Earth's surface temperature reasonably, including the rapidwarming after 1970s.

Could the Earth's surface Ultraviolet irradiance be blamed for the global warming? A new effect may exist