English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Arguments are essential objects in DirectDemocracyP2P, where they can occurboth in association with signatures for petitions, or in association with otherdebated decisions, such as bug sorting by importance. The arguments of a signeron a given issue are grouped into one single justification, are classified bythe type of signature (e.g., supporting or opposing), and can be subject tovarious types of threading.  Given the available inputs, the two addressed problems are: (i) how torecommend the best justification, of a given type, to a new voter, (ii) how torecommend a compact list of justifications subsuming the majority of knownarguments for (or against) an issue.  We investigate solutions based on weighted bipartite graphs.

Recommending the Most Encompassing Opposing and Endorsing Arguments in Debates