English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Earlier this year, we published a scathing critique of a paper by Mendez etal. (2013) in which the claim was made that a Y chromosome was 237,000-581,000years old. Elhaik et al. (2014) also attacked a popular article in ScientificAmerican by the senior author of Mendez et al. (2013), whose title was "Sexwith other human species might have been the secret of Homo sapiens's [sic]success" (Hammer 2013). Five of the 11 authors of Mendez et al. (2013) have nowwritten a "rebuttal," and we were allowed to reply. Unfortunately, our replywas censored for being "too sarcastic and inflamed." References were removed,meanings were castrated, and a dedication in the Acknowledgments was deleted.Now, that the so-called rebuttal by 45% of the authors of Mendez et al. (2013)has been published together with our vasectomized reply, we decided to makepublic our entire reply to the so called "rebuttal." In fact, we go one stepfurther, and publish a version of the reply that has not even beenself-censored.

An extended reply to Mendez et al.: The 'extremely ancient' chromosome that still isn't