English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

In computational cognitive science, the cognitive architecture ACT-R is verypopular. It describes a model of cognition that is amenable to computerimplementation, paving the way for computational psychology. Its underlyingpsychological theory has been investigated in many psychological experiments,but ACT-R lacks a formal definition of its underlying concepts from amathematical-computational point of view. Although the canonical implementationof ACT-R is now modularized, this production rule system is still hard to adaptand extend in central components like the conflict resolution mechanism (whichdecides which of the applicable rules to apply next).  In this work, we present a concise implementation of ACT-R based onConstraint Handling Rules which has been derived from a formalization in priorwork. To show the adaptability of our approach, we implement several differentconflict resolution mechanisms discussed in the ACT-R literature. This resultsin the first implementation of one such mechanism. For the other mechanisms, weempirically evaluate if our implementation matches the results of referenceimplementations of ACT-R.

Exchanging Conflict Resolution in an Adaptable Implementation of ACT-R