English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Argumentation is one of the most popular approaches of defininga~non-monotonic formalism and several argumentation based semantics wereproposed for defeasible logic programs. Recently, a new approach based onnotions of conflict resolutions was proposed, however with declarativesemantics only. This paper gives a more procedural counterpart by developingskeptical and credulous argument games for complete semantics and soundness andcompleteness theorems for both games are provided. After that, distribution ofdefeasible logic program into several contexts is investigated and bothargument games are adapted for multi-context system.

Credulous and Skeptical Argument Games for Complete Semantics in Conflict Resolution based Argumentation