English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This paper is a critique of version three of Joonmo Kim's paper entitled "Pis not equal to NP by Modus Tollens. [arXiv:1403.4143v3]" After summarizingKim's proof, we note that the logic that Kim uses is inconsistent, whichprovides evidence that the proof is invalid. To show this, we will consider tworeasonable interpretations of Kim's definitions, and show that "P is not equalto NP" does not seem to follow in an obvious way using any of them.

Critique of J. Kim's "P is not equal to NP by Modus Tollens"