English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We compare the performance of Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) with therelative new model of Multi-agent Inverse Reinforcement Learning (MIRL). Beforecomparing the methods, we extend a published Bayesian IRL approach that is onlyapplicable to the case where the reward is only state dependent to a generalone capable of tackling the case where the reward depends on both state andaction. Comparison between IRL and MIRL is made in the context of an abstractsoccer game, using both a game model in which the reward depends only on stateand one in which it depends on both state and action. Results suggest that theIRL approach performs much worse than the MIRL approach. We speculate that theunderperformance of IRL is because it fails to capture equilibrium informationin the manner possible in MIRL.

Comparison of Multi-agent and Single-agent Inverse Learning on a Simulated Soccer Example