English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Recently, Colbeck and Renner (2011) [arXiv:1005.5173] published a theoremthat appears to be stronger than the Bell (1964) theorem in a way that is moresignificant than the other variations of Bell's theorem that have beenpublished in the 50 years since Bell's theorem. Colbeck and Renner themselvesdo not relate their theorem directly to Bell's theorem, so here I present aversion of the Colbeck-Renner theorem that makes the relationship explicit.

How the Quantum Sorites Phenomenon Strengthens Bell's Argument