English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Particularly over the last ten years, Agile has attracted not only thepraises of a broad range of enthusiast software developers, but also thecriticism of others. Either way, adoption or rejection of Agile seems sometimesto be based more on a questionable understanding than on a critical,well-informed decision making process. In this paper, the dual nature of theabove criticism is discussed, and the arguments against Agile have beenclassified within a critical taxonomy of risk factors. A decisional model andtool based on such taxonomy are consequently proposed for supporting softwareengineers and other stakeholders in the decision-making about whether or not touse Agile. The tool, which is freely available online, comes with a set ofguidelines: its purpose is to facilitate the community of software developersto contribute to further assessing the potential and the criticalities of AgileMethods.

When Agile Is Not Good Enough: an initial attempt at understanding how to make the right decision