English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The creation of small and cheap sensors promoted the emergence of large scalesensor networks. Sensor networks allow monitoring a variety of physicalphenomena, like weather conditions (temperature, humidity, atmospheric pressure...), traffic levels on highways or rooms occupancy in public buildings. Someof the sensors produce large volume of data such as weather temperature. Thesedata should be stored somewhere for user queries. In this paper two knownsensor data storage methods that store data semantically has been compared andit has been shown that storing data in ontology form consumes more energy sothe lifetime of sensor network would decreases. The reason we choose them isthat they are useful and popular.

A Comparison with two semantic sensor data storages in total data transmission