English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

RPL, the routing protocol proposed by IETF for IPv6/6LoWPAN Low Power andLossy Networks has significant complexity. Another protocol called LOADng, alightweight variant of AODV, emerges as an alternative solution. In this paper,we compare the performance of the two protocols in a Home Automation scenariowith heterogenous traffic patterns including a mix of multipoint-to-point andpoint-to-multipoint routes in realistic dense non-uniform network topologies.We use Contiki OS and Cooja simulator to evaluate the behavior of theContikiRPL implementation and a basic non-optimized implementation of LOADng.Unlike previous studies, our results show that RPL provides shorter delays,less control overhead, and requires less memory than LOADng. Nevertheless,enhancing LOADng with more efficient flooding and a better route storagealgorithm may improve its performance.

Performance Comparison of the RPL and LOADng Routing Protocols in a Home Automation Scenario