English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

A series of papers in the ISJAEE Journal on 'dam-free hydroelectric powerstation' concluded by paper: Zotyev, D. B., Alternative energy vspseudo-science, ISJAEE. 2013. 8(130). P.131-136, is reviewed and commented. Acomparison with the generally accepted energy conservation law in hydrodynamicsreveals a disappointingly low scientific level of the reviewed papers (bothpro- and contra- the dam-free concept), not excluding the publishedpeer-reviewer reports. In the present version we emphasize that the ISJAEEjournal published several papers, which neglect and reject the basic physicalconcepts, such as the Bernoulli integral, the energy conservation law inhydrodynamics, the wave function of photon and some others, with all theserejected concepts being far beyond the scientific scope of the journal. Somereaders will be more concerned about the energy equation in hydrodynamics, inits theoretical form or in the Bernoulli integral form as being moretraditional in technical hydromechanics. Some readers will be shocked with thestatement that a photon does not possess the wave function. Overall, in thisway or in that way, all readers will hardly stay unsurprised.

The energy conservation law in hydrodynamics vs the pseudo-law of  alternative energy. Comment on 'Alternative energy vs pseudoscience' and the  papers cited and not cited therein