English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Though accepted that "team science" is needed to tackle and conquer thehealth problems that are plaguing our society significant empirical evidence ofteam mechanisms and functional dynamics is still lacking in abundance. Throughgrounded methods the relationship between scientific disciplines and team roleswas observed in a United States National Institutes of Health-funded (NIH)research consortium. Interviews and the Organizational Culture AssessmentInstrument (OCAI) were employed.. Findings show strong role and disciplineidiosyncrasies that when viewed separately provide different insights into teamfunctioning and change receptivity. When considered simultaneously,value-latent characteristics emerged showing self-perceived contributions tothe team. This micro/meso analysis suggests that individual participation inteam level interactions can inform the structuration of roles and disciplinesin an attempt to tackle macro level problems.

Role and Discipline Relationships in a Transdisciplinary Biomedical Team: Structuration, Values Override and Context Scaffolding