English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Bibliometric analysis has firmly conquered its place as an instrument forevaluation and international comparison of performance levels. Consequently,differences in coverage by standard bibliometric databases installed adichotomy between on the one hand the well covered 'exact' sciences, and on theother hand most of the social sciences and humanities with a more limitedcoverage (Nederhof, 2006). Also the latter domains need to be able to soundlydemonstrate their level of performance and claim or legitimate fundingaccordingly. An important part of the output volume in social sciences appearsas books, book chapters and national literature (Hicks, 2004). To proceed frompublication data to performance measurement, quantitative publication countsneed to be combined with qualitative information, for example from peerassessment or validation (European Expert Group on Assessment ofUniversity-Based Research, 2010), to identify those categories that representresearch quality as perceived by peers. An accurate focus is crucial in orderto stimulate, recognize and reward high quality achievements only. This paperdemonstrates how such a selection of publication categories can be based oncorrelations with peer judgments. It is also illustrated that the selectionshould be sufficiently precise, to avoid subcategories negatively correlatedwith peer judgments. The findings indicate that, also in social sciences andhumanities, publications in journals with an international referee system arethe most important category for evaluating quality. Book chapters withinternational referee system and contributions in international conferenceproceedings follow them.

Quality related publication categories in social sciences and humanities, based on a university's peer review assessments