English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In a recent article (arXiv:0909.2479) I reported the results of the test,where the takers had to tell the prose of Charles Dickens from the prose ofEdward Bulwer-Lytton. The former is a required reading in school, and thelatter has a bad writing contest named after him. Nevertheless, the test-takersperformed on the level of random guessing. This research has met muchcriticism, which I refute the in the present article.

Statistics against irritations: a response to Dickens's apologists