English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This article shows why the diffusion and peer-reviewing of research resultswould be more efficient, precise and relevant if all or at least some parts ofthe descriptions and peer-reviews of research results took the form of afine-grained semantic network, within articles or knowledge bases, as part ofthe Semantic Web. This article also shows some ways this can be done and hencehow research journal/proceeding publishers could allow this. So far, the WorldWide Web Consortium (W3C) has not proposed simple notations and cooperationprotocols - similar to those illustrated or referred to in this article - butit now seems likely that Wikipedia/Wikidata, Google or the W3C will proposethem sooner or later. Then, research journal/proceeding publishers andresearchers may or may not quickly use this approach.

For a Semantic Web based Peer-reviewing and Publication of Research Results