English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This letter is a response to a Divergent Views article entitled <<The poorperformance of TMM on microRNA-Seq>> (Garmire and Subramaniam 2013), which wasa response to our Divergent Views article entitled <<miRNA-seq normalizationcomparisons need improvement>> (Zhou et al. 2013). Using reproducible codeexamples, we showed that they incorrectly used our normalization method andhighlighted additional concerns with their study. Here, I wish to debunkseveral untrue or misleading statements made by the authors (hereafter referredto as GS) in their response. Unlike GSs, my claims are supported by R code,citations and email correspondences. I finish by making a call for betterpractice.

Agreeing to disagree, some ironies, disappointing scientific practice  and a call for better: reply to <<The poor performance of TMM on  microRNA-Seq>>

Agreeing to disagree, some ironies, disappointing scientific practice and a call for better: reply to <>