English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In a recent Comment [arXiv:1206.3671] on our calculation of the pioncontributions to the self-energy of the nucleon [arXiv:1201.4184], Ji,Melnitchouk and Thomas (JMT) correctly state that we obtain the same result asgiven by the pseudovector (PV) theory. We point out that this result isexpected by the equivalence theorem, since our pion-nucleon effective theoryputs the intermediate nucleon on its mass shell. We make no claim thatpseudoscalar (PS) and pseudovector interactions are equivalent in general. JMTalso argue that our theory will not give the correct PV result for the pionmomentum distribution $f^N_{\pi}$. We note that the discrepancies are muchsmaller than the uncertainties due to $\pi N$ form factors. To summarize,nothing in the Comment by JMT changes the conclusions or numerical results ofour work in any substantive way.

Alberg and Miller Reply to arXiv:arXiv:1206.3671