English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The interpretative principle proposed by Bub in 1211.3062v1 [quant-ph] isjustified only for all practical purposes (Bell's "FAPP trap"). An alternativeinterpretative principle is proposed. It brings to light those features of thequantum world because of which the fundamental theoretical framework of physicsis a "mere" probability calculus, and it amply justifies Bohr's insistence thatquantum-mechanical observables cannot be defined without reference to theexperimental conditions in which they are measured. It implies that the spatialdistinctions we make cannot be intrinsic to space, that regions "of space" mustbe realized by macroscopic objects, that the spatiotemporal differentiation ofthe physical world is incomplete, that the positions of macroscopic objects(suitably defined) are definite in a nonclassical sense, and that unconditionalfactuality can be consistently attributed to them.

Interpreting Bananaworld: A response to Bub's Quantum Mechanics for Primates