English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Using the referencing patterns in articles in Cognitive Science over threedecades, we analyze the knowledge base of this literature in terms of itschanging disciplinary composition. Three periods are distinguished: (1)construction of the interdisciplinary space in the 1980s; (2) development of aninterdisciplinary orientation in the 1990s; (3) reintegration into "cognitivepsychology" in the 2000s. The fluidity and fuzziness of the interdisciplinarydelineations in the different visualizations can be reduced and clarified usingfactor analysis. We also explore newly available routines ("CorText") toanalyze this development in terms of "tubes" using an alluvial map, and comparethe results with an animation (using "visone"). The historical specificity ofthis development can be compared with the development of "artificialintelligence" into an integrated specialty during this same period."Interdisciplinarity" should be defined differently at the level of journalsand of specialties.

Interdisciplinarity at the Journal and Specialty Level: The changing knowledge bases of the journal Cognitive Science