English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Let $u_\e$ be a solution to the system $$ \mathrm{div}(A_\e(x) \nablau_{\e}(x))=0 \text{\ in} D, \qquad u_{\e}(x)=g(x,x/\e) \text{\ on}\partial D,$$ where $D \subset \R^d $ ($d \geq 2$), is a smooth uniformly convex domain,and $g$ is 1-periodic in its second variable, and both $A_\e$ and $g$reasonably smooth. Our results in this paper are two folds. First we prove$L^p$ convergence results for solutions of the above system, fornon-oscillating operator, $A_\e(x) =A(x)$, with the following convergence ratefor all $1\leq p <\infty$ $$ \|u_\e - u_0\|_{L^p(D)} \leq C_p \begin{cases}\e^{1/2p} ,&\text{$d=2$}, (\e |\ln \e |)^{1/p}, &\text{$d = 3$}, \e^{1/p},&\text{$d \geq 4$,} \end{cases} $$ which we prove is (generically) sharp for$d\geq 4$. Here $u_0$ is the solution to the averaging problem. Second,combining our method with the recent results due to Kenig, Lin and Shen\cite{KLS1}, we prove (for certain class of operators and when $d\geq 3$) $$ ||u_\e - u_0 ||_{L^p(D)} \leq C_p [ \e (\ln(1/ \e))^2 ]^{1/p}. $$ for bothoscillating operator and boundary data. For this case, we take $A_\e=A(x/\e)$,where $A$ is 1-periodic as well. Some further applications of the method to thehomogenization of Neumann problem with oscillating boundary data are alsoconsidered.

Applications of Fourier analysis in homogenization of Dirichlet problem II. $L^p$ estimates