English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This short note points out two of the incongruences that I find in the Loredo(2012) comments on Andreon (2012), i.e. on my chapter written for the book"Astrostatistical Challenges for the New Astronomy". First, I find illogic theLoredo decision of putting my chapter among those presenting simple models,because one of the models illustrated in my chapter is qualified by him as"impressing for his complexity". Second, Loredo criticizes my chapter at onelocation confusing it with another paper by another author, because my chapterdo not touch the subject mentioned by Loredo (2012) critics, the comparisonbetween Bayesian and frequentist fitting models.

Comment on "Bayesian astrostatistics: a backward look to the future" by Tom Loredo, arXiv:1208.3036