English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We have obtained a "hierarchical regionalization" of 3,107 county-level unitsof the United States based upon census-recorded 1995-2000 intercounty migrationflows. The methodology employed was the two-stage (double-standardization andstrong component [directed graph] hierarchical clustering) algorithm describedin the 2009 PNAS (106 [26], E66) letter (arXiv:0904.4863). Various features (e.g., cosmopolitan vs. provincial aspects, and indices of isolation) of theregionalization have been previously discussed in arXiv:0907.2393,arXiv:0903.3623 and arXiv:0809.2768. However, due to the lengthy (38-page)nature of the associated dendrogram, the detailed tree structure itself was notreadily available for inspection. Here, we do present this (county-searchable)dendrogram--and invite readers to explore it, based on their particularinterests/locations. An ordinal scale--rather than the originally-derivedcardinal scale of the doubly-standardized values--in which groupings/featureswere more immediately apparent, was originally presented. Now, we append thecardinal-scale dendrogram.

Ordinal and Cardinal Dendrograms Depicting Migration-Based Regionalization of 3,000 + U. S. Counties