English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Quality attributes and constraints are among the main drivers ofarchitectural decision making. The quality attributes are improved or damagedby the architectural decisions, while restrictions directly include or excludeparts of the architecture (for example, the logical components ortechnologies). We can determine the impact of a decision of architecture insoftware quality, or which parts of the architecture are affected by aconstraint, but the difficult problem is whether we are respecting the qualityrequirements (requirements on quality attributes) and constraints with all thearchitectural decisions made. Currently, the common practice is that architectsuse their own experience to design architectures that meet the qualityrequirements and restrictions, but at the end, especially for the crucialdecisions, the architect has to deal with complex trade-offs between qualityattributes and juggle possible incompatibilities raised by the constraints. Inthis paper we present Quark, a computer-aided method to support architects insoftware architecture decision making.

Linking Quality Attributes and Constraints with Architectural Decisions