English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The time of occurrence of the large EQ that occurred recently in Mexico(March 20th, 2012, Mw = 7.4) is compared to the peak amplitude occurrence timeof the local M1 and K1 tidal components. It is shown that the specific EQoccurred one (-1) day before the next following peak of the M1 tidal component,and was delayed for only +20 minutes after the corresponding K1 tidal peak.Therefore, the specific seismic event complies quite well with the earlierproposed physical mechanism (lithospheric oscillation) that causes triggeringof large EQs.  Key words: Mexico, large earthquakes, M1 tidal wave, K1 tidal wave,lithospheric oscillations, tidal oscillations, short-term earthquakeprediction.

Do large EQs occur randomly in time? The Mexico EQ (20th of March, 2012,  Mw = 7.4) as viewed in terms of local lithospheric oscillation due to M1 and  K1 tidal components. A brief presentation