English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The note derives an expression for the number of interchanges made byselection sort when the sorting elements are iid variates from geometricdistribution. Empirical results reveal we can work with a simpler modelcompared to what is suggestive in theory. The morale is that statisticalanalysis of an algorithm's complexity has something to offer in its own rightand should be therefore ventured not with a predetermined mindset to verifywhat we already know in theory. Herein also lies the concept of an empirical O,a novel although subjective bound estimate over a finite input range obtainedby running computer experiments. For an arbitrary algorithm, where theoreticalresults could be tedious, this could be of greater use.

How many interchanges does the selection sort make for iid geometric(p) input?