English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In the last years, several models and simulations calculating the radioemission from cosmic ray air showers have been developed. However, a number ofthose made conflicting predictions on the pulse shapes and the amplitudes ofthe radio signal. In the scope of this paper, we discuss a detailed comparisonof two independent and complementary theoretical approaches, namely MGMR andREAS3. Furthermore, we study the influence of the underlying air shower modelson the predicted pulse shapes and amplitudes and show that remainingdiscrepancies between MGMR and REAS3 are mostly determined by the air showermodels. With this general agreement, a breakthrough in the understanding of themodelling of radio emission from air showers has been achieved.

A detailed comparison of REAS3 and MGMR simulations for radio emission from EAS