English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The width $\wid(G,W)$ of the verbal subgroup $v(G,W)$ of a group $G$ definedby a collection of group words $W$ is the smallest number $m$ in $\mathbb N\cup {+\infty}$ such that every element of $v(G,W)$ is can be represented asthe product of at most $m$ words in $W$ evaluated on the group $G$ and theirinverses. Recall that every verbal subgroup of the group $T_{n} (K)$ oftriangular matrices over an arbitrary field $K$ can be defined by just oneword: an outer commutator word or a power word. We prove that for every outercommutator word $w$ the equality $\wid(T_{n} (K),w)=1$ holds on the group$T_{n} (K)$ and that if $w=x^{s}$ then $\wid(T_{n}(K),w)=1$ except in twocases:  (1) the field $K$ is finite and $s$ is divisible by the characteristic $p$ of$K$ but not by $|K|-1$;  (2) the field $K$ is finite and $s=p^{t} (|K|-1)^{u} r$ for $r,t,u\in \mathbbN$ with $n\ge p^{t} +3$, while $r$ not divisible by $p$.  In these cases the width equals 2. For finitary triangular groups thesituation is similar, but in the second case the restriction $n\ge p^{t} +3$ issuperfluous.

On the Width of Verbal Subgroups of the Groups of Triangular Matrices over a Field of Arbitrary Characteristic