English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

There is a very common fallacy, here called the separation fallacy, that isinvolved in the interpretation of quantum experiments involving a certain typeof separation such as the: double-slit experiments, which-way interferometerexperiments, polarization analyzer experiments, Stern-Gerlach experiments, andquantum eraser experiments. It is the separation fallacy that leads not only toflawed textbook accounts of these experiments but to flawed inferences aboutretrocausality in the context of "delayed choice" versions of separationexperiments.

A Very Common Fallacy in Quantum Mechanics: Superposition, Delayed Choice, Quantum Erasers, Retrocausality, and All That