English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The relationship between quantum logic, standard propositional logic, and the(consistent) histories rules for quantum reasoning is discussed. It is shownthat Maudlin's claim [Am. J. Phys. 79 (2011) 954] that the histories approachis inconsistent, is incorrect. The histories approach is both internallyconsistent and adequate for discussing the physical situations considered byMaudlin.

The Logic of Consistent Histories: A Reply to Maudlin