English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Given the sensitivity of current ground-based Gravitational Wave (GW)detectors, any continuous-wave signal we can realistically expect will be at alevel or below the background noise. Hence, any data analysis of detector datawill need to rely on statistical techniques to separate the signal from thenoise. While with the current sensitivity of our detectors we do not expect todetect any true GW signals in our data, we can still set upper limits (UL) ontheir amplitude. These upper limits, in fact, tell us how weak a signalstrength we would detect. In setting upper limit using two popular method,Bayesian and Frequentist, there is always the question of a realistic results.In this paper, we try to give an estimate of how realistically we can set theupper limit using the above mentioned methods. And if any, which one ispreferred for our future data analysis work.

A decision between Bayesian and Frequentist upper limit in analyzing continuous Gravitational Waves