English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Recently, Borisenko et al have posted a Comment (arXiv:1108.1159) where theysuggest an alternative interpretation of our de Haas-van Alphen (dHvA)measurements on the superconductor LiFeAs. In our original paper(arXiv:1107.4375) we concluded that our measurements of the bulk Fermi surfacewere not consistent with the surface bands observed thus far by ARPES.Borisenko et al dispute this and suggest the two measurements are consistent ifsome of the orbits we observe are due to magnetic breakdown. We argue here thatthis scenario is inconsistent with the experimental data and therefore that ouroriginal conclusion stands.

Reply to Comment by Borisenko et al. on article `A de Haas-van Alphen study of the Fermi surfaces of superconducting LiFeP and LiFeAs'