English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In arXiv:1108.3058v1 [nucl-ex], Arrington criticizes the Coulomb correctionswe applied in the analysis of high precision form factor data (seePhys.Rev.Lett.105:242001, 2010, arXiv:1007.5076v3 [nucl-ex]). We show, bycomparing different calculations cited in the Comment, that the criticism ofthe Comment neglects the large uncertainty of "more modern" TPE corrections.This uncertainty has also been seen in recent polarized measurements. We rerunour analysis using one of these calculations. The results show that the Commentexaggerates the quantitative effect at small Q^2.

Reply to Comment on "High-Precision Determination of the Electric and Magnetic Form Factors of the Proton"