English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We argue that the constraints on transfers, given in the Letter [G. Plunk andT. Tatsuno, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 106}, 165003 (2011)], but not correctly, donot give the transfer and/or cascade directions which however can be assistedby the absolute equilibria calculated in this Comment, following Kraichnan [R.H. Kraichnan, Phys. Fluids {\bf 102}, 1417 (1967)]. One of the importantstatements about the transfers with only one or no diagonal component can beshown to be inappropriate according to the fundamental dynamics. Somemathematical mistakes are pointed out.

Comment on "Energy Transfer and Dual Cascade in Kinetic Magnetized Plasma Turbulence"