English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In the following we revisit the frequency interpretation of probability ofRichard von Mises, in order to bring the essential implicit notions in focus.Following von Mises, we argue that probability can only be defined for eventsthat can be repeated in similar conditions, and that exhibit 'frequencystabilization'. The central idea of the present article is that the mentioned'conditions' should be well-defined and 'partitioned'. More precisely, we willdivide probabilistic systems into object, environment, and probing subsystem,and show that such partitioning allows to solve a wide variety of classicparadoxes of probability theory. As a corollary, we arrive at the surprisingconclusion that at least one central idea of the orthodox interpretation ofquantum mechanics is a direct consequence of the meaning of probability. Moreprecisely, the idea that the "observer influences the quantum system" isobvious if one realizes that quantum systems are probabilistic systems; itholds for all probabilistic systems, whether quantum or classical.

A detailed interpretation of probability, and its link with quantum mechanics